- Welcome to Badmovies.org Forum.
Recent posts
#21
Off Topic Discussion / กระแสต่างประเทศ เว็บไซต์สำหรับ...
Last post by tomidda - Today at 02:18:24 AMจำนวนข้อมูลฟุตบอลบนโลกออนไลน์เพิ่มขึ้นอย่างต่อเนื่อง แต่สิ่งที่ผู้อ่านต้องการไม่ใช่เพียงตัวเลขจำนวนมาก หากเป็นการอธิบายว่าข้อมูลเหล่านั้นเกี่ยวข้องกับการแข่งขันอย่างไร เว็บไซต์ กระแสต่างประเทศ จึงนำเสนอเนื้อหาฟุตบอลในรูปแบบที่เชื่อมสถิติและบริบทของเกมเข้าด้วยกัน
เนื้อหา [spam]วิเคราะห์บอล บนเว็บไซต์ให้ความสำคัญกับองค์ประกอบก่อนการแข่งขัน ตั้งแต่ฟอร์มช่วงหลัง ผลงานในบ้านและนอกบ้าน สถิติการพบกัน ไปจนถึงความพร้อมของผู้เล่น เพื่อให้แต่ละข้อมูลมีบริบทและสามารถนำมาเปรียบเทียบได้อย่างเหมาะสม
นอกจากการดูว่าทีมใดกำลังชนะหรือแพ้ การทำความเข้าใจรูปเกมและสถานการณ์ปัจจุบันยังช่วยให้ติดตามฟุตบอลได้สนุกขึ้น ผู้อ่านสามารถเห็นที่มาของผลงาน และเข้าใจว่าทำไมทีมที่อันดับต่ำกว่าจึงอาจสร้างปัญหาให้กับทีมที่มีชื่อชั้นเหนือกว่าได้ในบางสถานการณ์
สำหรับแฟนฟุตบอลที่กำลังค้นหาเว็บไซต์เพื่ออ่านข้อมูลก่อนเกม [spam]กระแสต่างประเทศ จึงเป็นอีกหนึ่งแหล่งสำหรับติดตามบทวิเคราะห์และศึกษาปัจจัยสำคัญของการแข่งขัน โดยเน้นข้อมูลที่นำไปใช้ประกอบการพิจารณาได้มากกว่าการคาดการณ์จากชื่อทีมเพียงอย่างเดียว
เนื้อหา [spam]วิเคราะห์บอล บนเว็บไซต์ให้ความสำคัญกับองค์ประกอบก่อนการแข่งขัน ตั้งแต่ฟอร์มช่วงหลัง ผลงานในบ้านและนอกบ้าน สถิติการพบกัน ไปจนถึงความพร้อมของผู้เล่น เพื่อให้แต่ละข้อมูลมีบริบทและสามารถนำมาเปรียบเทียบได้อย่างเหมาะสม
นอกจากการดูว่าทีมใดกำลังชนะหรือแพ้ การทำความเข้าใจรูปเกมและสถานการณ์ปัจจุบันยังช่วยให้ติดตามฟุตบอลได้สนุกขึ้น ผู้อ่านสามารถเห็นที่มาของผลงาน และเข้าใจว่าทำไมทีมที่อันดับต่ำกว่าจึงอาจสร้างปัญหาให้กับทีมที่มีชื่อชั้นเหนือกว่าได้ในบางสถานการณ์
สำหรับแฟนฟุตบอลที่กำลังค้นหาเว็บไซต์เพื่ออ่านข้อมูลก่อนเกม [spam]กระแสต่างประเทศ จึงเป็นอีกหนึ่งแหล่งสำหรับติดตามบทวิเคราะห์และศึกษาปัจจัยสำคัญของการแข่งขัน โดยเน้นข้อมูลที่นำไปใช้ประกอบการพิจารณาได้มากกว่าการคาดการณ์จากชื่อทีมเพียงอย่างเดียว
#22
Games / Re: Answer the question with a...
Last post by bob - August 21, 2026, 10:56:18 PMBlack Widow
Where are you moving to?
Where are you moving to?
#23
Off Topic Discussion / Re: Memes n' stuff of the day
Last post by LilCerberus - August 21, 2026, 08:20:53 PM
#24
Entertainment / Re: What have you been listeni...
Last post by Allhallowsday - August 21, 2026, 04:38:47 PMQuote from: Rev. Powell on August 19, 2026, 06:13:19 PMBOB MARLEY AND THE WAILERS CATCH A FIREDo you like it? I love it. Also listening to PETER TOSH lately (last couple of years). Old school obviously.
...
I actually listened to selections from that this weekend (not the entire album front to back, though I have heard it before). I just learned I'll be visiting Jamaica this coming November.
I hope your trip is wonderful!
#25
Entertainment / Re: What have you been listeni...
Last post by Allhallowsday - August 21, 2026, 04:34:16 PMSIOUXSIE AND THE BANSHEES Once Upon a Time- The Singles
#26
Bad Movies / Re: 100 *alliterative* movie t...
Last post by zombie no.one - August 21, 2026, 04:20:27 PM98. OUT OF REACH (2004)
- the only Steven Seagal movie that qualifies, so I had to get it in.
(also coincidentally my favourite SS movie of the 2000s..)
- the only Steven Seagal movie that qualifies, so I had to get it in.
(also coincidentally my favourite SS movie of the 2000s..)
#27
Good Movies / Re: Recent Viewings, Part 2
Last post by M.10rda - August 21, 2026, 03:46:14 PMWORKING GIRLS (1931):
A much-better representation of 20s/30s director Dorothy Arzner than 1930's ANYBODY'S WOMAN, a typically downbeat Ruth Chatterton "comedy" that suffered additionally from early sync-sound challenges. This one was also written by a woman (based on a play by two women!) and edited by a woman, and all of those women are doing better work than a lot of men in the early 30s. Unlike most any film from the era, WORKING GIRLS (which takes place in a "dormitory" for young working class women who have left home in early adulthood to spare their economically Depressed families) would easily pass the Bechdel Test, as it has four times as many female characters as male characters and those characters talk about work and home and booze and dreams and other stuff that isn't "Men"....... though the plot does (natch) end up focusing on Men quite a bit.
To place WORKING GIRLS in a couple other useful frames of reference... yeah, sister protagonists Mae and June
are keeping one eye on their jobs and one eye (and both hands) on potential future husbands, but that seems like less an emblem of their gender expectations and more a (reasonable!) reflection of their economic realities: the jobs generally available to gals kinda' suck and the quickest option out of poverty is by way of a sugar daddy. That doesn't mean (as we see in June's arc) that one must forego all dignity and personal standards to bag a hubby, it just means a girl's gotta' be strategic and at times ruthless w/ her Life Planning. I only watched 1988's WORKING GIRL once, probably in 1989, and (in spite of Harrison Ford, Sigourney Weaver, and a fun score) have no plans to ever revisit it....... but to the best of my recollection WORKING GIRLS is a more progressive portrayal of women at work than vacuous Melanie Griffith and her big hair.
Although there is humor, there's also some palpable drama, underlined by (as mentioned above) thoughtful editing that occasionally emphasizes the sadness and desperation of the characters. June is a year younger than nineteen year old Mae but about twenty years smarter and more mature, and must become her sister's keeper, sometimes at the risk of her own security and happiness. This dynamic does get parlayed into some amusing (if high-stakes) climactic hijinks, with June borrowing her musician boyfriend's handgun in order to strongarm Mae's wealthy and flighty paramour. That tense conflict is resolved at greater length (and more awkwardly) than most glib romcoms of the 30s - actually it feels more like a character-driven script of the 70s or 80s.
But WORKING GIRLS still has more in store - a real left-field last-minute twist that flips the script on our expectations for and understanding of June. Maybe it cheapens June or maybe it makes June more complicated, sympathetic, and authentic - but it's definitely a Choice that shows that Arzner and her distaff crew were going Big with their finale.
Good acting throughout, too, including the less-glamorous/budget Bela Lugosi, Paul Lukas
as one of the love interests. I liked this one. 4/5
A much-better representation of 20s/30s director Dorothy Arzner than 1930's ANYBODY'S WOMAN, a typically downbeat Ruth Chatterton "comedy" that suffered additionally from early sync-sound challenges. This one was also written by a woman (based on a play by two women!) and edited by a woman, and all of those women are doing better work than a lot of men in the early 30s. Unlike most any film from the era, WORKING GIRLS (which takes place in a "dormitory" for young working class women who have left home in early adulthood to spare their economically Depressed families) would easily pass the Bechdel Test, as it has four times as many female characters as male characters and those characters talk about work and home and booze and dreams and other stuff that isn't "Men"....... though the plot does (natch) end up focusing on Men quite a bit.
To place WORKING GIRLS in a couple other useful frames of reference... yeah, sister protagonists Mae and June
are keeping one eye on their jobs and one eye (and both hands) on potential future husbands, but that seems like less an emblem of their gender expectations and more a (reasonable!) reflection of their economic realities: the jobs generally available to gals kinda' suck and the quickest option out of poverty is by way of a sugar daddy. That doesn't mean (as we see in June's arc) that one must forego all dignity and personal standards to bag a hubby, it just means a girl's gotta' be strategic and at times ruthless w/ her Life Planning. I only watched 1988's WORKING GIRL once, probably in 1989, and (in spite of Harrison Ford, Sigourney Weaver, and a fun score) have no plans to ever revisit it....... but to the best of my recollection WORKING GIRLS is a more progressive portrayal of women at work than vacuous Melanie Griffith and her big hair. Although there is humor, there's also some palpable drama, underlined by (as mentioned above) thoughtful editing that occasionally emphasizes the sadness and desperation of the characters. June is a year younger than nineteen year old Mae but about twenty years smarter and more mature, and must become her sister's keeper, sometimes at the risk of her own security and happiness. This dynamic does get parlayed into some amusing (if high-stakes) climactic hijinks, with June borrowing her musician boyfriend's handgun in order to strongarm Mae's wealthy and flighty paramour. That tense conflict is resolved at greater length (and more awkwardly) than most glib romcoms of the 30s - actually it feels more like a character-driven script of the 70s or 80s.
But WORKING GIRLS still has more in store - a real left-field last-minute twist that flips the script on our expectations for and understanding of June. Maybe it cheapens June or maybe it makes June more complicated, sympathetic, and authentic - but it's definitely a Choice that shows that Arzner and her distaff crew were going Big with their finale.
Good acting throughout, too, including the less-glamorous/budget Bela Lugosi, Paul Lukas
as one of the love interests. I liked this one. 4/5 #28
Good Movies / Re: Recent theatrical viewings
Last post by Dr. Whom - August 21, 2026, 02:15:28 PMI found Reflection more fun because it had action straight from the start, and has a freewheeling attitude to storytelling. Miasma on the contrary is trying to make a point and is not always subtle about it. That being said, Miasma had several laugh out loud moments.
#29
Games / Re: Answer the question with a...
Last post by Rev. Powell - August 21, 2026, 11:23:21 AM
Who do you want to marry?
#30
Good Movies / Re: Childhood nightmare fuel p...
Last post by M.10rda - August 21, 2026, 11:07:36 AMI just saw an online petition to urge the MPAA that any film in which a dog dies should automatically be rated R. (No mention of cats in the petition, alas.) Now I hate seeing animals die in movies, but - per your comment, Chainsaw - what's the sense in shielding children from the realities of life? That's why I'm introducing my own petition to the MPAA: All Bigfoot horror movies should automatically be rated G - like in the good old days!