- Welcome to Badmovies.org Forum.
Recent posts
#32
Bad Movies / Re: Generate Movie Poster with...
Last post by claws - June 29, 2026, 10:21:14 AM
Quote from: bob on June 29, 2026, 08:36:39 AMit's just as described
I was using the copilot website for posters and was stuck with nothing for image generation
I used the different copilot installed on my computer, while it doesn't have the create a poster option on the left it can generate images so I'm back on the copilot train with 113 posters currently in my AI poster movie poster
#33
Games / Re: Answer the question with a...
Last post by bob - June 29, 2026, 08:38:20 AM
Why do people recycle?
#34
Bad Movies / Re: Generate Movie Poster with...
Last post by bob - June 29, 2026, 08:36:39 AMit's just as described
I was using the copilot website for posters and was stuck with nothing for image generation
I used the different copilot installed on my computer, while it doesn't have the create a poster option on the left it can generate images so I'm back on the copilot train with 113 posters currently in my AI poster movie poster
I was using the copilot website for posters and was stuck with nothing for image generation
I used the different copilot installed on my computer, while it doesn't have the create a poster option on the left it can generate images so I'm back on the copilot train with 113 posters currently in my AI poster movie poster
#35
Games / Re: Movie Title Chains
Last post by Rev. Powell - June 29, 2026, 08:13:18 AMTen Little Indians (1965)
#37
Entertainment / Re: What have you been listeni...
Last post by Rev. Powell - June 29, 2026, 08:09:40 AM
#38
Bad Movies / Re: Generate Movie Poster with...
Last post by Rev. Powell - June 29, 2026, 08:07:01 AM
(I confess, my prompt included "be sure to include an image of something on fire")
#39
Games / Re: Answer the question with a...
Last post by Rev. Powell - June 29, 2026, 08:01:33 AMLook again, I think you posted the wrong imgage, Bob.
#40
Good Movies / Re: Recent Viewings, Part 2
Last post by M.10rda - June 29, 2026, 07:57:35 AMELDORADO (1921):
Here's a silent film that definitely "mixes it up" (per the conversation above). Director Marcel L'Herbier really loves an artistic composition and there are plenty of them in ELDORADO, though tbh there are also plenty of bland, boring, and conventional shots, too, which I guess emphasizes the really lovely ones but there's little enough going on in this film that I'd just as soon it was one painterly banger after another. This is a well-made and Good film but a hard one to recommend. The renowned L'Herbier's later L'ARGENT is almost 3 hours long but is so clear (in spite of being silent) and compelling that it was a joy to watch and little effort at all; ELDORADO however is about 100 minutes where very little seems to happen yet it happens very very slowly and yet is also quite confusing!
There are few intertitles, you only get some expository info-dumps in (lengthy) close-ups on letters, and much of the film is folks walking, partying, holding hands, crying near the bedside of infirm loved ones, looking out windows and appearing nonplussed, etc etc etc. The actual plot is rather straightforward and probably could have been related in 25 minutes instead of 100; it's also the same old tiresome early 20th century Nobility of Female Suffering crap. Okay, I'm making ELDORADO sound like a Bad film.
The good/cool things about ELDORADO don't really justify a viewing but are worth mentioning. For one thing, it may have been a partial inspiration for LAST YEAR AT MARIENBAD. Much of the quote-unquote intrigue takes place at the Alhambra Hotel, which isn't the famous one in California but instead one in France that - might also be famous for all I know! It's definitely cool looking and I feel like I've seen it in other foreign movies (maybe Franco flicks?!) and L'Herbier obviously had a ball photographing sad/angry/lovelorn people moping around the Alhambra, being sad and in love, staring cryptically offscreen, etc. One of those characters is the protagonist, who does the most moping and wandering and staggering of all, within the Alhambra and outside of it, and as she's a pale dark-haired European woman in a black dress, as she runs in a frenzied/neurotic fashion through stark European landscapes it's hard to avoid seeing her as an early ancestor of Daliah Lavi in THE DEMON and Isabelle Adjani in POSSESSION. Finally, ELDORADO seems to me to be the earliest motion picture to do the "not revealing the title until the end of the movie", which was virtually unheard of for 100+ years notwithstanding APOCALYPSE NOW though lots of movies do it these days. When L'Herbier finally does post up the title at the end of ELDORADO, it's done in an extremely stylish/artistic way and also provides a final diegetic "moment" to the female lead's sad story. So that's real darn cool. (...Though maybe the print I watched was just missing the title in the beginning...?)
Unquestionably an early/silent Art Film. 3/5 L'Herbier definitely improved a great deal as a director during the 20s.
Here's a silent film that definitely "mixes it up" (per the conversation above). Director Marcel L'Herbier really loves an artistic composition and there are plenty of them in ELDORADO, though tbh there are also plenty of bland, boring, and conventional shots, too, which I guess emphasizes the really lovely ones but there's little enough going on in this film that I'd just as soon it was one painterly banger after another. This is a well-made and Good film but a hard one to recommend. The renowned L'Herbier's later L'ARGENT is almost 3 hours long but is so clear (in spite of being silent) and compelling that it was a joy to watch and little effort at all; ELDORADO however is about 100 minutes where very little seems to happen yet it happens very very slowly and yet is also quite confusing!
There are few intertitles, you only get some expository info-dumps in (lengthy) close-ups on letters, and much of the film is folks walking, partying, holding hands, crying near the bedside of infirm loved ones, looking out windows and appearing nonplussed, etc etc etc. The actual plot is rather straightforward and probably could have been related in 25 minutes instead of 100; it's also the same old tiresome early 20th century Nobility of Female Suffering crap. Okay, I'm making ELDORADO sound like a Bad film.The good/cool things about ELDORADO don't really justify a viewing but are worth mentioning. For one thing, it may have been a partial inspiration for LAST YEAR AT MARIENBAD. Much of the quote-unquote intrigue takes place at the Alhambra Hotel, which isn't the famous one in California but instead one in France that - might also be famous for all I know! It's definitely cool looking and I feel like I've seen it in other foreign movies (maybe Franco flicks?!) and L'Herbier obviously had a ball photographing sad/angry/lovelorn people moping around the Alhambra, being sad and in love, staring cryptically offscreen, etc. One of those characters is the protagonist, who does the most moping and wandering and staggering of all, within the Alhambra and outside of it, and as she's a pale dark-haired European woman in a black dress, as she runs in a frenzied/neurotic fashion through stark European landscapes it's hard to avoid seeing her as an early ancestor of Daliah Lavi in THE DEMON and Isabelle Adjani in POSSESSION. Finally, ELDORADO seems to me to be the earliest motion picture to do the "not revealing the title until the end of the movie", which was virtually unheard of for 100+ years notwithstanding APOCALYPSE NOW though lots of movies do it these days. When L'Herbier finally does post up the title at the end of ELDORADO, it's done in an extremely stylish/artistic way and also provides a final diegetic "moment" to the female lead's sad story. So that's real darn cool. (...Though maybe the print I watched was just missing the title in the beginning...?)
Unquestionably an early/silent Art Film. 3/5 L'Herbier definitely improved a great deal as a director during the 20s.