Re: To Wyre Wizard

[claws]

His "reality flaw" game got old real quick, and I can understand people getting riled up about it.
Ignoring WW is the best one can do because as they say, don't feed the troll.

I prefer to think of it less as "feeding" and more "poking with a sharp stick."

Same difference, really. You guys think you are having fun with him but that's just a reality flaw on your behalf - he is the one still getting a kick out of it.
Ever tried to analyze a troll? It's their fetish because they follow a different drummer. It gives them pleasure mentally, and maybe physically.
While you are poking him with a sharp stick he might be slapping some serious ham. Think about it 

[Newt]

You guys think you are having fun with him but that's just a reality flaw on your behalf - he is the one still getting a kick out of it.

Too true.  Any attention is good attention.

Ah, and you guys just continue to feed it's ego. My suggestion is to do one of two things, either make fun of it (personally I think it's fun) or ignore it. Those are the only two options worth considering.

The most effective thing to do is to laugh from a distance: replies to its thread just 'feed' it.  You won't find me replying to its threads. I find its attempts to present logical and "scientific" explanations to be highly laughable: puerile to the point of being totally false.   They are just as inaccurate and flawed as the 'reality flaws' it rails on about.  Either this is deliberately baiting response (and I hesitate to grant it that level of intelligence - sorry Menard!) or it really is either self-deluded or just plain DUMB.  Or both; I could go for both.  

[Menard]

The most effective thing to do is to laugh from a distance: replies to its thread just 'feed' it.  You won't find me replying to its threads. I find its attempts to present logical and "scientific" explanations to be highly laughable: puerile to the point of being totally false.   They are just as inaccurate and flawed as the 'reality flaws' it rails on about.  Either this is deliberately baiting response (and I hesitate to grant it that level of intelligence - sorry Menard!) or it really is either self-deluded or just plain DUMB.  Or both; I could go for both.  

A variation on "hold your friends close, and your enemies closer" is to overestimate your enemy, not underestimate them; this way they will disappoint you in the end, not impress you. If your enemy ever impresses you, they win.

I did say that WyreDick is more intelligent that he appears...I didn't say he doesn't appear to be retarded.

[JayJayM12]

I did say that WyreDick is more intelligent that he appears...I didn't say he doesn't appear to be retarded.

Dude, you gotta turn your karma on just for a few minutes - I HAVE to plus that one (I dribbled my drink a bit)...

[Leah]

you people are hilarious, just watching you bicker about Wyres**t being an a***ole is funny.
here's how I'm like:

[voltron]

The thing I don't like about WW is that he generally nitpicks about mainstream movies and he seems to forget that this is a BAD movie forum, not obvious mainstream horses**t that everyone else has seen. There's a thing called "suspension of disbelief" and I don't think WW has an ounce of it.

[Chainsawmidget]

you people are hilarious, just watching you bicker about Wyres**t being an a***ole is funny.
here's how I'm like:

Bald, bright yellow, and have a horrible overbite?

[Menard]

you people are hilarious, just watching you bicker about Wyres**t being an a***ole is funny.
here's how I'm like:

Wow...that makes me think so much of WyreDick and how much he finds entertainment in sitting back and watching the rest of us bicker at him.

Frankly I'm not too different in that regard, nor are a lot of us.

We come here for the basic reason of entertainment. Some like to sit back and watch the bickering, some like to be involved in the bickering. That's not a description of everyone obviously, but at the very core of diversion is a desire to find entertainment, and at that very core level we're not that different, including WyreDick with the rest of us.

[Newt]

This is 'bickering'?   

[Menard]

This is 'bickering'?   

Doesn't bickering usually involve disagreement? I don't think anybody has disagreed that WyreDick is an a$$hole.

[RCMerchant]

The thing I don't like about WW is that he generally nitpicks about mainstream movies and he seems to forget that this is a BAD movie forum, not obvious mainstream horses**t that everyone else has seen. There's a thing called "suspension of disbelief" and I don't think WW has an ounce of it.

I agree 100%.

[WyreWizard]

Pure Hatred and Contempt.  You gotta love them.  Its seems I have been called every insult in the human language in this forum, LOL!!!

I have stated my opinions (most of which are fact) about things in a lot of mainstream films which are both ridiculous and unrealistic.  You guys just like to flame me with a 100 megatons of napalm.  Some of you keep shoving that "suspension of disbelief" crap on me.  That to me is more like "Suspension of the acknowledgement of the rules of reality, human behavior and other things found in real life."  Others push artistic license on me.  Now I've told you what insane things the movie industry has driven people do to.

I admit that I have never directly attacked anyone on these boards (unlike Menard here.)  I only attack people who throw the first punch.  I often like to have a good debate and a lot of you on this board are good at that, some so good they would win the hot seat in the White House.

Some things I have seen in movies are questionable, not because if they are real or not but because if they ever will be possible.

Now one thing I don't understand is why those of you who like to attack me, why don't you just ignore my posts?  Did I ever hold a gun to your head, tell you to read my post then flame me afterwards?  No, you did that of your own freewill and that freaking irritates me.  That tells me you get sadistic pleasure from doing so.

That's my only conclusion...unless you can prove otherwise which I highly doubt.

[Psycho Circus]

That's my only conclusion...unless you can prove otherwise which I highly doubt.

I personally don't have a problem with you, but I think statements like that and the way it which you start your posts seem to be quite "provocative" and light a fuse with a select few people. Anyway, always best not to rise to any bait - Ignorance is bliss as they say...

[Pacman000]

Pure Hatred and Contempt.  You gotta love them.  Its seems I have been called every insult in the human language in this forum, LOL!!!

I have stated my opinions (most of which are fact) about things in a lot of mainstream films which are both ridiculous and unrealistic.  You guys just like to flame me with a 100 megatons of napalm.  Some of you keep shoving that "suspension of disbelief" crap on me.  That to me is more like "Suspension of the acknowledgement of the rules of reality, human behavior and other things found in real life."  Others push artistic license on me.  Now I've told you what insane things the movie industry has driven people do to.

I admit that I have never directly attacked anyone on these boards (unlike Menard here.)  I only attack people who throw the first punch.  I often like to have a good debate and a lot of you on this board are good at that, some so good they would win the hot seat in the White House.

Some things I have seen in movies are questionable, not because if they are real or not but because if they ever will be possible.

Now one thing I don't understand is why those of you who like to attack me, why don't you just ignore my posts?  Did I ever hold a gun to your head, tell you to read my post then flame me afterwards?  No, you did that of your own freewill and that freaking irritates me.  That tells me you get sadistic pleasure from doing so.

That's my only conclusion...unless you can prove otherwise which I highly doubt.

Instead of just complaining about unrealistic movies, why not recommend films you like?

[Menard]

I admit that I have never directly attacked anyone on these boards (unlike Menard here.)  I only attack people who throw the first punch.  I often like to have a good debate and a lot of you on this board are good at that, some so good they would win the hot seat in the White House.

And when you make accusations, princess, you'd best be prepared to back them up.


There are only three things you are good at:

1) Instigating and provoking
2) Lying
3) Being a coward

You proved being a coward several years ago when I gave you a public ass whipping on this forum, and it took months and months before you would dare show your ugly fvcking mug on here.

Would you like a repeat performance?

I wouldn't mind.