Main Menu

FULL METAL JACKET (1987)

Started by Allhallowsday, April 22, 2023, 02:36:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Allhallowsday

FULL METAL JACKET (1987)  Hadn't seen it in decades.  Wow.  :thumbup:
If you want to view paradise . . . simply look around and view it!

RCMerchant

I LOVE that movie.
One of my top 10 war movies.
That movie is f**ked up. If your old enough to recall watching Vietnam on the news in the 60's and 70's, it aint like watching the news now. It showed everything. It was f**ked up.
Supernatural?...perhaps. Baloney?...Perhaps not!" Bela Lugosi-the BLACK CAT (1934)
Interviewer-"Does Dracula ever end for you?
Lugosi-"No. Dracula-never ends."
Slobber, Drool, Drip!
https://www.tumblr.com/ronmerchant

Cult_Moody_Movies

I haven't rewatched it in years. From my last watch, the 1st half is fantastic but once they leave the boot camp the film is generic war movie.

I prefer both Platoon and Apocalypse Now.


RCMerchant

^ I whole heartly disagree. The first part was just a prelude.

" These are the greatest people we will ever know."

Supernatural?...perhaps. Baloney?...Perhaps not!" Bela Lugosi-the BLACK CAT (1934)
Interviewer-"Does Dracula ever end for you?
Lugosi-"No. Dracula-never ends."
Slobber, Drool, Drip!
https://www.tumblr.com/ronmerchant

M.10rda

I had the same reaction to the narrative dichotomy the first time I saw this. D'Onofrio and Ermey dominate the first half of the film and none of the other characters stand out much or hold my attention in the second half. However, that was clearly Kubrick's intention. He sends us off into this whole other alienating dimension where everyone's a stranger and cipher, and where death lies around every corner. The final stretch w/ the sniper is just grueling. A highly FORMAL cinematic experiment... exactly what we expect from Kubrick, right?

bob

An underrated Kubrick classic.

PRIVATE SNOWBALL!
Kubrick, Nolan, Tarantino, Wan, Iñárritu, Scorsese, Chaplin, Abrams, Wes Anderson, Gilliam, Kurosawa, Villeneuve - the elite



I believe in the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Trevor

I used this movie's local release in 1987 as an example of Apartheid censorship stupidity when I did my interview the other day. If you were between the ages of 2 to 21 you couldn't see this movie but if you were 16 and a high school graduate, you could be conscripted into the army. 😳😳
We shall meet in the place where there is no darkness.

Allhallowsday

Quote from: Cult_Moody_Movies on April 22, 2023, 04:04:51 PM
I haven't rewatched it in years. From my last watch, the 1st half is fantastic but once they leave the boot camp the film is generic war movie.

I prefer both Platoon and Apocalypse Now.

It's the flip opposite for me.  The first half is intensely claustrophobiv.   The twisted messages and savaged innocence of the 2nd half is not a "generic war movie".  No heroes.  But there is "Mickey Mouse... Mickey Mouse..." eerily beautifully filmed. 
If you want to view paradise . . . simply look around and view it!

Rev. Powell

I'm another fan of the first half over the second half. I think the first half is a masterpiece. There's good stuff on the back end, but I find it a bit of a letdown given how good the beginning was.
I'll take you places the hand of man has not yet set foot...

Gabriel Knight

Add me to the list of "loved the first half" people. The second part was actually boring for me, and couldn't care less about it.
Check my crappy and unpopular reviews and ratings:

https://www.imdb.com/user/ur85652268/?ref_=nv_usr_prof_2

ER

Quote from: Gabriel Knight on April 24, 2023, 12:41:46 PM
Add me to the list of "loved the first half" people. The second part was actually boring for me, and couldn't care less about it.

Ditto.
What does not kill me makes me stranger.

Allhallowsday

Kubrick built up the content of the first 3rd of the novel the film is based on, for the well regarded first half.  The second half is based on the last two thirds of the novel... I think, the name I don't recall. 

I found the first half of endless abuse disturbing, as it resolves.  It is riveting, but not self-contained as its typically read.  The 2nd half is after destruction of humanity, pointless killing.  Inhumanity upon inhumanity.  "Together we will hold our banner high!  High! High! High!" 

Kubrick sure didn't aim to give pleasant reassuring messages. 
If you want to view paradise . . . simply look around and view it!

Neville

I'm with most of you. It's a great movie, but the second half pales in comparison to the first. As M.10rda said, the first half has the sergeant and Gomer Pyle. The second? A dead VC in a pagoda and Joker getting mugged in Saigon. No contest.

It does pick up during the last stages, when the platoon gets pinned by sniper fire and what comes next.
Due to the horrifying nature of this film, no one will be admitted to the theatre.

Allhallowsday

Quote from: Neville on April 25, 2023, 10:29:05 AM
I'm with most of you. It's a great movie, but the second half pales in comparison to the first. As M.10rda said, the first half has the sergeant and Gomer Pyle. The second? A dead VC in a pagoda and Joker getting mugged in Saigon. No contest.

It does pick up during the last stages, when the platoon gets pinned by sniper fire and what comes next.

Joker isn't mugged, his friend's (Raptor man) camera is stolen.  The lies pile up.  The sniper happens.  She is a child.  Joker has no more jokes.  The first half of the film is extremely personal.  The second half is de-personalized. 
If you want to view paradise . . . simply look around and view it!

RCMerchant

I'm with John on this one. I am fascinated by the film as a whole.
Supernatural?...perhaps. Baloney?...Perhaps not!" Bela Lugosi-the BLACK CAT (1934)
Interviewer-"Does Dracula ever end for you?
Lugosi-"No. Dracula-never ends."
Slobber, Drool, Drip!
https://www.tumblr.com/ronmerchant