https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7976208/Haven't seen it, don't want to see it. I'm sure it's just as tasteless as everyone says it is. What I'm curious about is the IMDb rating, 3.1/10.
Once in a while I'll take a gander at IMDb's bottom 100.
The highest rated movie is (As I'm writing this post) the 2008 remake of Prom Night with a score of 4.1/10. The lowest is Disaster Movie with a score of 2.0/10.
I remember there being controversy when the infamous "musician" Justin Bieber got a documentary called "Justin Bieber: Never Say Never" that got a score of 1.6/10, yet
it didn't make the bottom 100. I even remember people accusing IMDb of taking bribe money. The elephant in the room with this movie is the fact that
obviously the vast majority of people that gave it a 1/10 hadn't even watched the movie. They just hated Bieber so much they 1-starred it regardless since
he was very widely despised back then (And even today to a lesser extent, but most people just don't care anymore).
My assumption was that it didn't get on the bottom because the movie had a 52/100 Metascore from official critics. Every movie with a Metacritic page
has the Metascore on their IMDb as well.
However I've noticed that The Haunting of Sharon Tate, which has a 3.1/10 also has a
8/100 Metascore.
With a score far worse than Prom Night it makes me kinda wonder how the list works. If it's automatic or if someone needs to change it manually. My best guess is that new movies
don't register until they've been out for a while. Obscure films shows don't seem to register at all, but I'm not sure this qualifies. I just want to know the exact mechanics.