>I've given quite a bit of thought to UFOs, and I think that the usual reasons for
>considering them highly unlikely to be alien spacecraft rest on some unsound
>assumptions, such as that each UFO would have to have made it's own
>seperate superluminal voyage from Zeta Reticuli or the Pleadies each time.
>Couldn't they have all come in one giant sub-light generation ship a million years
>ago and established bases all over the solar system? Or couldn't they even be
>native to Mars or Titan?
Everyone knows that they have a base on the darkside of the moon. There have been a couple books about it;
Somebody Else is on the MoonWe Discovered Alien Bases on the Moon IIAlso, I have a file sitting on a disk, that I got off the net a long time ago, which claims to be the true account of a couple people who decided to go straight to NASA and check out the high-quality original photos. I have no idea if there's any truth to it, but they claimed that NASA first gave them the run-around for a couple days, then finally gave them access to the archives, but on the condition that they couldn't bring any writing implements or recorders. They had to ask for the photos by number (which they knew ahead of time) and then they were allowed to view the very large, high-quality original prints, which were described as being razor sharp and showing beyond any doubt, artificial structures on the moon's surface. According to the file, they memorized a few print numbers so that they could request prints through normal channels. Supposedly when the prints arrived, they were of much lower quality so that everything just looked like shadows or rocks.