Bad Movie Logo
"A website to the detriment of good film"
Custom Search
HOMEB-MOVIE REVIEWSREADER REVIEWSFORUMINTERVIEWSUPDATESABOUT
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:04:28 PM
714473 Posts in 53097 Topics by 7743 Members
Latest Member: medikam
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Movies  |  Good Movies  |  THERE WILL BE BLOOD (2007) « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: THERE WILL BE BLOOD (2007)  (Read 3635 times)
CheezeFlixz
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 496
Posts: 3747


Pathetic Earthlings


WWW
« on: May 22, 2008, 01:10:17 AM »



I almost put it in the BAD MOVIE thread, because while it was a entertaining moving at times, it drug more than it ran. Now keep in mind it won 2 OSCARS and was up for I think 5 others ... IMHO I'm not sure it was that good.

Here's the story, Danial Plainview a poor silver miner how turns into a ruthless oilman in the early 1900's. He buys up land, makes promises, breaks them and is cruel to nearly everyone. It follows his life from his start to his rise, his dealing with a young bipolar preacher, his son that isn't his, a brother out of nowhere and a whole host of other characters, nearly all of which are just unlikable. That's really about it and it took 154 minute to tell that story. To say the move was slow is a understatement. Now there are underlaying stories of Danial fight various inner demons that he fights mostly with alcohol and everyone else. The greater story is about a lonely highly driven man that will let nothing and no one stand in his path to success and he'll make any sacrifice and sacrifice anybody to achieve he goals.
Overall it was a enjoyable movie, but it's not as great as some have made it out to be. I don't see myself watching it again anytime soon, it just lacks that rewatchability quality. As I've said some scenes were just to long and some parts of the story were not needed. I don't mind a long film if all the scenes are a part of the over all story arc which in my opinion some of the scenes and characters where just not that important to the story. It not boring if you pay attention to it, I've seen a lot of "it's boring" comments on other boards, but I don't agree with those, slow ... yes. Boring ... no. It's worth watching if you are in the mood for this kind of film, slow, dramatic, long and I'm not sure why it got a R rating, I do not recall much if any cuss words, not graphic violence (at least on screen) really it should have been a PG-13 of which I've seen worse with that rating ... kids would leave this movie is a skinny minute, it's not everyones cup of oil.

I'm giving it 3 out of 5 and I'm being kind with that.
The disc I rented had no extras, but with a movie this long there was no room for extras.

The TRAILER
Small | Large
Logged

peter johnson
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 107
Posts: 1489



« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2008, 10:57:13 AM »

Funnily enough, neither my wife nor I thought much of this either.  I say "funnily enough" because we both think Day-Lewis is the best actor in cinema today.  We even have a hand-written letter from him framed above my Robochic poster --

Essentially, he is giving the same performance here that he gave in "Gangs of New York", for which he and Scorscese were practically ignored.  I think this is an example of retro-Oscar, that you see all the time in Hollywood, wherein he was really being rewarded for prior overlooked performances.

Now, to length:  Neither Dixie nor I were put off by the film's length, and both of us in fact feel that it should be longer/that there should be a Director's Cut of it somewhere.  I thought it should have been at least 180min or longer, as the edits and jump-cuts are so annoying here.  We both felt that huge amounts of connecting storyline had been left out or dropped & we wanted loose ends tied up.  Badly.  Maybe it would have been a better film at 4 hours, cut into 2 completely different films & released at later dates.  This has worked before.

The scene where they're attacking the flaming oil derrick with their home-made explosive armored carts is as exciting as anything put on an film ever.  It reminded us very much of the Babylon castle sequence in "Intolerance".

Yes, a mixed bag all around --

Peter Johnson/Denny Epic Epic Movie . . .

Logged

I have no idea what this means.
Mofo Rising
Global Moderator
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 460
Posts: 3222


My cat can eat a whole watermelon!


WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2008, 02:03:13 PM »

I actually really enjoyed this one, although I found it an extremely uncomfortable movie to watch. Mostly due to the ever present threat of violence. The ominous film score helped to aid that as well.

What I do admire about the film is the lengths it went to truly demolish Day-Lewis' character. At the beginning he seems a rough but admirable kind of guy. Hard-working, intelligent, looks after his business and his son. By the end of the movie we see what a misanthropic and repulsive human being he actually is. (And I like misanthropes.)

So I really enjoyed it.
Logged

Every dead body that is not exterminated becomes one of them. It gets up and kills. The people it kills, get up and kill.
CheezeFlixz
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 496
Posts: 3747


Pathetic Earthlings


WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2008, 04:17:05 PM »

Quote from: Peter/Denny/Dixie/Peter/Paul and Mary
Now, to length:  Neither Dixie nor I were put off by the film's length, and both of us in fact feel that it should be longer/that there should be a Director's Cut of it somewhere.  I thought it should have been at least 180min or longer, as the edits and jump-cuts are so annoying here.  We both felt that huge amounts of connecting storyline had been left out or dropped & we wanted loose ends tied up.  Badly.  Maybe it would have been a better film at 4 hours, cut into 2 completely different films & released at later dates.  This has worked before.

With all the character in the film it could have been longer to wrap things up, I found the ending a tad annoying as I know the final two words could take on a number of meanings. (those that saw it know the words, no need to spoil here) OTHERWISE they could have cut the length and cut a few characters OR spent more time on Danial's character. I think they tried to have to many key characters that were never fully developed. Was Eli/Paul two people or one? If he was one, which I think he was that was never clear. It just drug in parts, and parts of the story seemed to be missing. I really don't think it was a Oscar worthy film. I enjoyed it ... but it just didn't set my world on fire.
Logged

Scott
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 186
Posts: 5785


Hey, I'm in the situation room ! ! !


WWW
« Reply #4 on: May 27, 2008, 09:21:06 AM »

This film is high on my list of films to view. THERE WILL BE BLOOD might be similiar in pace and such as GANGS OF NEW YORK which also starred Daniel Day-Lewis who was good in that film also. Neat little fact though about oil. Oil was first drilled in Northwestern Pennsylvania not far from where I once lived.

Oil Drilling History: http://www.priweb.org/ed/pgws/history/pennsylvania/pennsylvania.html

Small | Large
« Last Edit: May 27, 2008, 09:29:02 AM by Conan » Logged

Pages: [1]
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Movies  |  Good Movies  |  THERE WILL BE BLOOD (2007) « previous next »
    Jump to:  


    RSS Feed Subscribe Subscribe by RSS
    Email Subscribe Subscribe by Email


    Popular Articles
    How To Find A Bad Movie

    The Champions of Justice

    Plan 9 from Outer Space

    Manos, The Hands of Fate

    Podcast: Todd the Convenience Store Clerk

    Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!

    Dragonball: The Magic Begins

    Cool As Ice

    The Educational Archives: Driver's Ed

    Godzilla vs. Monster Zero

    Do you have a zombie plan?

    FROM THE BADMOVIES.ORG ARCHIVES
    ImageThe Giant Claw - Slime drop

    Earth is visited by a GIANT ANTIMATTER SPACE BUZZARD! Gawk at the amazingly bad bird puppet, or chuckle over the silly dialog. This is one of the greatest b-movies ever made.

    Lesson Learned:
    • Osmosis: os·mo·sis (oz-mo'sis, os-) n., 1. When a bird eats something.

    Subscribe to Badmovies.org and get updates by email:

    HOME B-Movie Reviews Reader Reviews Forum Interviews TV Shows Advertising Information Sideshows Links Contact

    Badmovies.org is owned and operated by Andrew Borntreger. All original content is © 1998 - 2014 by its respective author(s). Image, video, and audio files are used in accordance with the Fair Use Law, and are property of the film copyright holders. You may freely link to any page (.html or .php) on this website, but reproduction in any other form must be authorized by the copyright holder.