In my observation, our media is always pro-sodomy and anti-Christian, and "tolerance" always only goes in one direction. The reason I oppose "marriage" between two people of the same sex is because it legally imposes their phony definitions of marriage on the rest of us and discriminates against those of us who oppose them based on our creed.
Case in point: the pro-sodomy groups are forever complaining about hiring and firing discrimination, but the preacher at my church was, in fact, forced to resign from a company where he was employed back before he was a preacher because they were ordering all of their employees into some kind of convention or parade or something promoting sodomy. Needless to say, I don't think any of the hate-mongering hypocrites currently screaming against Chick-Fil-A much care about what happened to him, or what happens to the great many more Christians like him they're oppressing and discriminating against in
their workplaces. (Incidentally, his courageous stand also convinced another Christian lady to quit.)
Sodomy supporters are always acting as if giving the sodomites their way on "marriage" would be harmless to the rest of us. Oh really? I submit, for your consideration, that sodomy supporters are fascist thugs, that they have bullied, oppressed, and persecuted us using what perverted laws they already have in place, and that they very much intend to use same-sex "marriage" to do the same thing.
More cases in point:
Will anybody who doesn't believe in same-sex "marriage" be allowed to refuse to be the photographers at a same-sex "wedding" on First Amendment grounds? [urlhttp://www.lifesite.net/news/photographers-guilty-of-discrimination-for-refusing-to-shoot-same-sex-weddi]The tyrants in black robes in a New Mexico court say no.[/url]
Speaking of tyrants in black robes, California's Proposition 8 amendment to the state constitution passed with overwhelming support from black Democrats, whereupon the sodomy supporters took it to court. Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who's er, into sodomy himself, refused to recuse himself from the case. Gosh, wonder what his decision was? It's pretty blatantly lawless to rule a
constitutional amendment un-Constitutional, but
other judicial tyrants stood by their fellow judicial tyrant's decision saying this, of course. By the way, if you support Proposition 8, sodomy supporters think they should
"Burn [your] f---ing churches to the ground, and then tax the charred timbers."Then there's North Carolina's Proposition 1, which passed 60-40. The sodomy supporters' responses? Here's one of the nicer ones:
"Can I just kill everyone in North Carolina?" That link leads to a lot more of this
civility from all those
loving,
tolerant sodomy supporters who just can't quite bring themselves to understand why I'm so bitterly opposed to all this
loving and
tolerance of theirs.
Their child-recruiting group GLSEN
is pushing kiddie porn in schools to ever-younger groups of kids using our tax dollars. Here's one of the
cleaner passages from one of the books they're pushing:
My sexual exploits with my neighborhood playmates continued. I lived a busy homosexual childhood, somehow managing to avoid venereal disease through all my toddler years. By first grade I was sexually active with many friends. In fact, a small group of us regularly met in the grammar school lavatory to perform fellatio on one another. A typical week’s schedule would be Aaron and Michael on Monday during lunch; Michael and Johnny on Tuesday after school; Fred and Timmy at noon Wednesday; Aaron and Timmy after school on Thursday. None of us ever got caught, but we never worried about it anyway. We all understood that what we were doing was not to be discussed freely with adults but we viewed it as a fun sort of confidential activity. None of us had any guilty feelings about it; we figured everyone did it. Why shouldn’t they?
--
Reflections of a Rock LobsterQuestion: in view of of their pushing this sick stuff on our kids, why hasn't every GLSEN member been arrested for child molesting and moral turpitude?
Answer: Because it's
mental child molesting. That's
different. We have to be
tolerant of it because it's "free" speech (paid for with tax dollars) and they're "fighting hatred" (of pederasty and pedophilia) in our schools. Only a hateful Christian bigot could possibly be opposed making kids read pederastic porn, obviously.
Mercifully, "Safe School Czar" Kevin Jennings, who spearheaded this effort in our schools with full support from the current administration in the White House (not to mention NAMBLA),
is gone. Not so mercifully, GLSEN is still very much in our public schools, and continues to push this perversion on our kids. Gosh, why would anybody be afraid to trust sodomites and their supporters with our kids?
Of course, if same-sex "marriage" were legalized, people would almost
have to let these perverts "adopt" children and show them these books to help indoctrinate them with their sicko beliefs, wouldn't they?
And if a
scientific study makes the mild observation that children on the whole tend to be at a bit of a disadvantage being raised under two "mommies" or "daddies" as compared to the traditional family, well, the people who did that study
will have to be "scrutinized" (bullied) won't they? Do you suppose we'd be seeing any of this "scrutiny" from the usual suspects if the study had made the contrary observation? That's a little something to remember the next time sodomy supporters claim the science is on their side: it's easy to bend science to one's agenda when contrary observations are outlawed. That's one reason you'd never know there's no such thing as a "gay" gene and sodomites are most definitely
not "born that way."
Needless to say, sodomy supporters are also determined to
outlaw reparative therapy just to make
sure that nobody is allowed to change his or her sexual desires. De Cecco's analysis of Kinsey's work which suggested that it was telling us
sexuality is "changeable as the weather" will, of course, have to be outlawed too.
I could go on, but I think it should suffice to say that as far as I can see, same-sex "marriage" doesn't really have anything to do with love or liberty, but only with promoting perversion and outlawing all dissenting opinions. If a man wants to "marry" another man or a woman another woman, they can already draw up a private legal contract conferring all the general legal benefits of marriage on them; plenty of lawyers are more than willing (for a fee) to play along with any definition of marriage you may have, including if you'd like to marry your sheep. (You might still not be allowed to
have sex with your sheep depending on your state's laws, but you can
marry them.) Inheritance laws, likewise, allow you to leave everything to whomever you wish, including pets, wild animals, and inanimate objects. (e.g. "I hereby leave my entire vast fortune to be burned on a campfire.")
If marriage is really what you want, there is absolutely nothing in American law preventing you from being married in the eyes of any god who'll have you right now. (The Christian God won't, no matter what any of the Bible-rejecting pretend-Christians who support sodomy may say.) What the sodomite bullies and thugs are seeking is to be married in the eyes of their god the
state, which will then allow them to punish dissenting thought criminals such as Christians with unemployment, heavy fines, and possibly prison time. If the sodomites were really into marital liberty, they could call for privatization; instead, they demand the state be their bully pulpit. That's why true Christians and everyone else who believes in religious liberty should resist it.
This latest assault on Chick-Fil-A is merely one in a long line of thuggish assaults on religious liberty in America, and I am somewhat heartened to see that people still resist these anti-religious hate campaigns. With these perverts poisoning the minds of the next generation in our public schools, however, I can only wonder how much longer we'll be able to hold out. The nearest Chick-Fil-A is an hour's drive from my house, but the next time I'm down in the city, I think I'll pay it a visit for lunch.
