IFC with commercials: you ain't missin' so much, 'cept they don't censor language or content... maybe it makes sense since all of the film is there if you're willing to put up with them damned c'mmershills.
I hate LAST HOUSE and often proclaim such on this forum and elsewhere. It's not memorable exactly, you just reach a point of desensitization and drag your eyes around the screen for the rest of that horrid film. It's very important, and is now unfortunately a must-see. I get it. I just don't like it. I hate it, so maybe it's exactly what you're looking for. There's also MAKE THEM DIE SLOWLY, I'd expect readily available, and vile.
Oh! SPOORLOOS is a Dutch and French co-production.
Oh yeh, how 'bout THE HILLS HAVE EYES?
What all of these films have in common is violation of the female character.
Have you seen TWO WOMEN? Have you seen LA DOLCE VITA? Have you seen LADY IN A CAGE?
Very true, it depends on ones point of view. Often times that idea is very disturbing. I tend to not like it as I feel uncomfortable. I tend to not like such scenes. I don't like the new Hills Have Eyes for that reason. It is something I find disturbing. I prefer things that don't use such situations so highly. However, on that same note it tends to be things that people find most disturbing. I would prefer avoiding it when possible. However, it is hard.
I will take your word on Last House. It is merely the ending and I understand the basic principle just not the specific. I didn't actually enjoy it to be honest. There are some I like and some I dislike.
However, I understand a difference in feeling for instance Hills Have Eyes disgusts me not really terrifying. There is a bit where I wonder whether film is horrifying or disgusting. Disgusting is usually more shock value, where terror or horror is often times more subtle. For instance, with very little additional information in Spoorloos one is terrified by the simple fact your mind plays on you. Wondering the specifics and stark realizations. It happens all in the mind.