Bad Movie Logo
"A website to the detriment of good film"
Custom Search
HOMEB-MOVIE REVIEWSREADER REVIEWSFORUMINTERVIEWSUPDATESABOUT
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 09:12:25 AM
714401 Posts in 53097 Topics by 7742 Members
Latest Member: KathleneKa
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Movies  |  Bad Movies  |  TRAFFIC: And the critics said this film was good? Wow! « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: TRAFFIC: And the critics said this film was good? Wow!  (Read 2657 times)
Chris K.
Guest
« on: July 15, 2001, 11:55:35 AM »

I just saw the so-called "critically acclaimed" film TRAFFIC yesterday night. So the critics said this was a good film about drug selling. Well, it seems like the critics were smoking it up while watching this piece of garbage. Basicaly, the plot goes off in a tangent and keeps changing from one setting to another with different characters and puts the films running time to about 145 boring minutes. TRAFFIC looks like it was originaly filmed in two versions and placed together to make it look like it is one complete film. It is always said that a film has it beginning and end. Well, TRAFFIC only had a beginning and had NO ENDING. The ending was completely out-of-it and dreadfully dull. Plus, even though Michael Douglas is top billed his presence is utterly wasted for he does nothing but walk around, say a few dull lines, and walks off as the film goes to it's next character and location. The only scenes that WERE INTERESTING were the ones that take place in Mexico.

The film tries to give the message that the War on Drugs can be stopped. But I beg to differ on that message. The message should have been the War on Drugs CANNOT be stopped.

TRAFFIC is a film that had potential, but if it were cut down to a 100 minute running time then it would have been better.

Questions or comments anyone?
Logged
Guitarwolf
Guest
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2001, 12:21:43 PM »

Everyone I've talked to that has seen this film, hated it. I don't know what's up with movie critics. I think the public disagrees as well. Back in 1999, every film other than the Matrix, that the film critics gave a thumbs up or recommendation of, bombed. The films that the critics trashed, however did very well. And what was Roger Ebert smokeing when he said Little Nicky was Adam Sandlers best film. Since I liked Bulletproof and Happy Gilmore, I gave it a shot. The film was horrible. The only thing it had going for it, was trying to spot all of the cameos.
Some other films that the critics raved about that I thought were horrible:
How to make an American Quilt
Fried Green Tomatoes
Meet Joe Black
I don't even mess with critics anymore. I try to decide by checking around the web looking movies that do more to describe a movie, rather than praise or condem it.
Logged
Steve.
Guest
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2001, 01:58:32 PM »

Traffic the movie (I agree it's crap) is based on a UK tv series - Traffik -  about the heroin trade, which was pretty good. Yet another case of a movie being much worse than it's source.
Logged
Will
Guest
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2001, 02:14:41 PM »

I can't believe there wasn't outrage that the fact that the precious white p***y is given up to "evil" black dick for drugs.  What a bunch of s**t.  f**k the drug war and Hollywood s**theads that churn that crap out for the consumption of the gullible masses.
Logged
Steve.
Guest
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2001, 04:12:21 PM »

The drugs war was lost all around the world years ago.
Logged
Jim Hepler
Guest
« Reply #5 on: July 17, 2001, 01:15:55 AM »

Well, I had mixed feelings on Traffic...  And the reason it had such a blah ending was pointful - the war on drugs is never ending, and can not be won.  It wasn't trying to say it could be won, didn't any of the character's speeches (like the guy in protective custodity) indicate that to you?  

And the thing with the black guy - would it have been better if he'd been white?  It wasn't the point that he was black, rather the point the story was trying to make was that she'd sunk to the lowest level to get drugs.
Logged
ThumbsnvrUp
Guest
« Reply #6 on: July 17, 2001, 01:29:14 AM »

I gotta agree with Chris, this movie stunk.  I still am having a hard time figuring out exactly what the point behind the scenes with Benicio Del Toro was all about since it looked the most promising.  I too rented this dud hoping for once all of the "critic's" reviews were on point.  I now realize they are being slipped cash or something to hype crappy movies.  Not even worth the $4.00 and change for the rental price, believe me.
Logged
Pages: [1]
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Movies  |  Bad Movies  |  TRAFFIC: And the critics said this film was good? Wow! « previous next »
    Jump to:  


    RSS Feed Subscribe Subscribe by RSS
    Email Subscribe Subscribe by Email


    Popular Articles
    How To Find A Bad Movie

    The Champions of Justice

    Plan 9 from Outer Space

    Manos, The Hands of Fate

    Podcast: Todd the Convenience Store Clerk

    Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!

    Dragonball: The Magic Begins

    Cool As Ice

    The Educational Archives: Driver's Ed

    Godzilla vs. Monster Zero

    Do you have a zombie plan?

    FROM THE BADMOVIES.ORG ARCHIVES
    ImageThe Giant Claw - Slime drop

    Earth is visited by a GIANT ANTIMATTER SPACE BUZZARD! Gawk at the amazingly bad bird puppet, or chuckle over the silly dialog. This is one of the greatest b-movies ever made.

    Lesson Learned:
    • Osmosis: os·mo·sis (oz-mo'sis, os-) n., 1. When a bird eats something.

    Subscribe to Badmovies.org and get updates by email:

    HOME B-Movie Reviews Reader Reviews Forum Interviews TV Shows Advertising Information Sideshows Links Contact

    Badmovies.org is owned and operated by Andrew Borntreger. All original content is © 1998 - 2014 by its respective author(s). Image, video, and audio files are used in accordance with the Fair Use Law, and are property of the film copyright holders. You may freely link to any page (.html or .php) on this website, but reproduction in any other form must be authorized by the copyright holder.